I like Scott McLeod’s thoughtful and often provocative ed tech blog Dangerously Irrelevant. But I’m a little skeptical about an idea he’s floating. He starts off a new post with two self-evident observations: 1) Most staff development is awful, and 2) Kids are often technology “experts” on technology. No argument there. But he follows those ideas off a cliff, proposing a Big Idea: Have students deliver technology-related professional development for teachers.
The kids get the learning power and social/emotional benefit of being teachers and leaders. Adults and other students learn from the true experts. All we have to do is walk away from our egos and our fear and embrace our mission statements, the ones that say that we all should be learners and say nothing about from whom we must learn. How about it? You ready to start doing this?
How about no? I applaud McLeod’s premise and agree that we should give kids every opportunity to be the experts. Letting them be responsible for classroom computer maintenance and training for parents and younger students would be useful and “authentic.” Perhaps I’m just quibbling about the what constitutes “professional development.” But training that simply tells teachers how to use tech tools doesn’t meet my definition of professional development. Good technology P.D. should be focused on effective instruction using technology — technology is a means to an end, not an end in itself – and that is (one assumes) beyond what a student can deliver. We should be past the point of thinking we’re teaching with technology because we have computers and smart boards in the classroom.







Recent Comments