Archive for the 'Teaching' Category

The Twitter Challenge

Is Twitter in the classroom a gimmick?  Or can it really be an effective teaching tool?  I’m agnostic.   

“Using Twitter in a classroom setting can bring challenges, but some educators and students think it’s a tool that can boost the learning process,” notes a typical piece in U.S. News which goes on–also typically–to offer exactly no compelling examples.

I’ve been writing about teaching and technology in one form or another for over 15  years, so I’m no Luddite.  If it works, I’m in.  But I’ve yet to hear of an example of using Twitter in the classroom that uses it to deepen understanding, not just for bells and whistles.  So here’s a challenge:  give an example of effective use of Twitter in a K-8 classroom. There’s only one rule:  you may not use the phrase ”student engagement” in your reply.

“The Year of the Bad Teacher”

Wall Street Journal blogger Sue Shellenbarger asks what’s a parent supposed to do when a child’s teacher is a rotten apple?  And how do you know?  Her children had many more good teachers than bad in public schools.  But she describes a “dark chapter” in her family’s life–the year of the bad teacher:

Unknown to me, the teacher singled out my daughter for ridicule for her offbeat clothing choices.  The teacher also made her a target of frequent criticism for the ideas she tried to bring up in class. The big picture was no better; students in the class made poor progress in reading and arithmetic….I should have realized far sooner that my daughter had been dealt a losing card. But my daughter said nothing. I was concerned that her interest in school seemed to dip that year, but she internalized most of her distress, blaming herself, she finally told me years later. Meanwhile, this teacher had a great reputation among parents. She had a warm, hip façade; she knew how to meet-and-greet, and she always behaved well when I volunteered in the classroom. We live and learn.

In this case, she writes, the system works.  The teacher was pressured by the principal to depart and is no longer teaching.  Still, parents are unaware until too late, she notes, that their children have been dealt a losing hand.  Most of the commenters on the WSJ tend to agree.  One teacher, writes one, ”berated and humiliated my child in front of her class to the point where I later discovered “How to Commit Suicide Painlessly” websites on her laptop.  My child admitted it was the teacher who pushed her to the edge.”

It’s Always Fun Until Someone Loses an Eye

You can never be too safe….or can you?  Nearly half of teachers in the U.K. say school health and safety regulations have gone too far.  Among the complaints: a five-page briefing on the safe handling of glue sticks and being told to wear goggles to put up posters.

End Athletic Tracking!

The 15,000 pupil Stamford, Connecticut school system, ”among the last bastions of rigid educational tracking,” is abandoning the practice, which the New York Times describes as ”an uncomfortable caste system.”   But if the Times is so concerned about tracking, asks Will Fitzhugh, why are they silent on “the complete dominance of athletic tracking in schools all over the country?” As unbelieveable as it seems, deadpans the editor of The Concord Review, there is no real movement to eliminate it.

Athletes in our school sports programs are routinely tracked into groups of students with similar ability, presumably to make their success in various sports matches, games, and contests more likely. But so far no attention is paid to the damage to the self-esteem of those student athletes whose lack of ability and coordination doom them to the lower athletic tracks, and even, in  many cases, may deprive them of membership on school teams altogether.

Fitzhugh observes that the elimination of tracking is a product of educators who are ”more committed to diversity and equality of outcomes in classrooms than they are in academic achievement.”  I would also add that mixed ability grouping on sports teams is not unheard of.  The New York Mets have been doing it for years.

What’s 2+2? Ask the Math Department

If I have three apples, and give you one, how many apples will I have?  Better ask someone in the math department.

The traditional one-teacher elementary school model  is giving way to a middle school format, with different teachers for reading, math, science and social studies in Palm Beach County, Florida.  Some schools will have subject-specific teachers as early as kindergarten, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports.  Parents and teachers are reportedly ”steamed” about the plan, and are demanding to see research demonstrating the move will help improve performance. 

Administrators say there are numerous benefits for the teaching model, such as morphing teachers from jacks-of-all-trades to  subject-matter experts. Officials say departmentalization will help schools respond to new state standards and new versions of the FCAT beginning in 2011, resulting in higher achievement among even the most-struggling students.  “They are going to have to trust that we as educators are doing what’s right for their children,” Chief Academic Officer Jeffrey Hernandez said Monday. “We are constantly reforming our schools to meet the needs of our students.”

But Robert Dow, president of the Palm Beach Classroom Teachers Association, dismisses the move as a “fad” without anything concrete to back it up.  “Departmentalization?” Dow asks. “Seven syllables. Gotta be good. No research, but hey! All elementary teachers will be departmentalized whether they like it or not, whether what they do now works or not.”

I can see some benefits to the plan, not the least of which is the tendency to give short shrift to subjects like science and social studies that are not tested.  That said, very young children almost certainly benefit from the security and continuity of a relationship of a single teacher.

It’s Not Your Fault, But It Is Your Problem

Mark Bauerlein has a piece on the Chronicle of Higher Ed’s Brainstorm blog that should give pause to those whose definition of achievement in public education starts and stops with reading and math scores. 

Bauerlein spins a fictional tale of a top Emory University law school student interviewing at one of the leading law firms in Atlanta.  Over lunch with the senior partners, the conversation turns toward the older gentlemen’s memories of the Cold War. “It’s not a test, and it’s not planned,” Bauerlein notes.  ”For them, the Cold War is simply one of those realities that any intelligent person is familiar with and has some opinions about.”  But the overachieving young man has nothing to add and is conspicuously out of his depth.   

The others have the tact to move on, but they note the deficiency. It doesn’t cost the young man the job, but the senior fellows make a judgment. This guy, they think, is sharp and hard-working, but get out of his training and he doesn’t bring much to the table. The deeper awareness that makes for a sober judgment and wider perspective is missing…This is the professional value of cultural literacy. It counts a lot more in professional spheres than academics and educators realize. The measure is informal, yes, but it makes a difference in how peers and superiors regard you.

Bauerlein’s piece reminded me of a conversation I had with an unusually bright student a few years ago.  She blew away every math and reading test she’d ever taken, but her walking around knowledge of even basic history, geography and current events was virtually nonexistent (Granted, she was a 5th grader, but she was under the impression that New Jersey was a country).  Discussing the gaps in her education, I told her, “This is not your fault, but it is your problem.”  Indeed, this young lady had done absolutely everything asked of her in school.  Her lack of breadth was not something she chose, but something we had allowed to happen to her.   If the gaps in her knowledge persist into adulthood, I knew, the world would certainly judge her skeptically, even harshly, for precisely the reasons Bauerlein describes–especially as a person of color from the South Bronx. 

Crucially, this was a kid with top scores on standardized tests–one of my school’s rare ”double 4s” in both math and reading.  By that measure–but only by that measure–a screaming success story of public education.  But what the data doesn’t show, and Baurlein’s piece reminds us, is that out in the real world there are very different metrics at work.  There’s too often far less to our current definition of success than meets the eye.

What Do You Want to Be?

When I grow up, I want to be a curriculum deliverer in a managed learning environment!

Concerns Over “False Transparency”

What makes two smart but small and decidedly non-athletic middle school boys want to risk life and limb to try out for the school football team?  Their teacher Bill Ferriter was shocked at their answer.  “”We’re going to be great at football,” they replied.  “We completely dominate in Madden 2008 on our PlayStations.  No one can beat us!”

These two boys who had never played an organized sport in their life—-let alone an organized sport where physicality is essential for success and where brutal hits are commonplace—-had convinced themselves that football was the right sport for them because of their video game prowess.  In their minds, mastering skills with digital players on an electronic field in their living rooms translated somehow into an belief that they would excel on a real field wearing real pads trying to tackle 200-pound kids without breaking their necks!

Ferriter, a North Carolina teacher who writes the superb blog The Tempered Radical, is concerned about the “false transparency” created by video games.  Kids claim to be good at playing the guitar because they’ve mastered Guitar Hero.  Or they express an interest in becoming soldiers because “war seems fun” after playing Call of Duty.  “Becoming more ‘realistic’ by the year, new digital toys seem to provide the ‘complete experience’for users who walk away believing that they ‘know’ just what it means to be a rock star, battlefield general, or super-jock,” Ferriter writes.

Deeply strange.  And disturbing.  Ferriter, who is typically bullish on technology-assisted learning, worries this false transparency is hurting kids.

I’m just starting to wonder whether one of the unintended consequences of easy access to electronic experience is that we’re raising a generation of children who have a flawed sense of their personal strengths and weaknesses?  Are middle schoolers—-who love fantasy and imagination to begin with—confused, failing to find the line between fiction and reality when determining what they “know” and “can do?”

Interesting and provocative insights from one of our most thoughtful classroom observers. 

(HT: Anthony Rebora)

Eduspeak Is Canned, Not Candid

Candor and straight talk are rare in education, and euphemisms abound, observes Maureen Downey, the education columnist for the Atlanta Journal and Constitution.  At one level, the jargon can be amusing, such as the habit of referring to one of the buildings at her son’s school as the cottage. “Personally, I would describe the place where fifth-graders attend class as a trailer,” Downey writes. ”But then, I’m not an education professional.”   More seriously, she notes that happy talk and edubabble contribute to parental mistrust of schools.

My husband and I once had a 10-minute sidewalk chat with a school consultant working at a local elementary school. After a conversation about psychometrics, scaffolding, formative assessments and zone of proximal development, we walked away asking one another, “What was she saying?”  The use of education jargon serves as a defense mechanism, to keep parents at bay and to establish from the onset who is the expert and who is the amateur. It becomes a way to silence questions and squelch opposition.

Downey wonders if ”beleaguered and scapegoated” educators can afford to be honest and forthcoming.  ”If principals admit to unhappy parents that a new teacher is not proving effective,” she points out, ”they may also have to tell those parents that they’re stuck with the teacher anyway, since it’s not an easy task to replace staff midyear.”

The Importance of Solitude

A favorite canard in education is the one about Rip Van Winkle waking up after one hundred years’ sleep and easily recognizing a classroom.  It’s probably more accurate  to suggest, however, that if old Rip were suddenly jarred awake, it would be due to the noise from a nearby elementary school, with its incessant hum of group work, collaborative learning, and nonstop “turn and talks.” 

What our classrooms have lost, writes Diana Senechal in an Education Week essay, is badly needed quiet time for thinking, reading, and problem solving.   “It is not at all good to be visibly ‘engaged’ at every moment,” she notes.  “One also needs room to collect one’s thoughts and separate oneself from one’s peers.”  She wonders why there is so much emphasis on socialization in education and so little on solitude, when both are important to learning?

Solitude should not become a fad; that would make some of us wish we had never brought it up at all. The shift toward solitude should be subtle, not screeching. Don’t abandon group work, but take it down from its altar. Make room for quiet thought and give students something substantial to think about. The children will respond. Also, recognize teaching as a thinking profession. There is no reason for teachers to sit in groups filling out Venn diagrams during professional-development sessions when they could be doing something more interesting on their own.

It’s an excellent point.  Now, turn to your neighbor and tell whether you agree or disagree…

Diana is a teacher at a Core Knowledge school in NYC.  And if you haven’t been reading her thoughtful guest posts for Joanne Jacobs over the past week, take a look.