Archive for the 'Research and Reports' Category

While You Were Out

I’m almost sorry I chose to be on the north rim of the Grand Canyon when my home state of New York announced that universal proficiency is nigh. Better than four out of five public school students in the Empire State are suddenly at or above grade level in math up from 73 percent last year while 69 percent of students were at or above state standards.

There’s so much to say about lowering the bar and how the good news doesn’t square with NAEP results, but lots of other commenters including Sol Stern were on the job while I was away:

Sometime in the next decade, the white children of Lake George and the black children of New York City will come face to face with reality. On a high school math Regents test—or on an SAT test, or in a college remediation course—they will discover that they are not quite as proficient as New York State once assured them.

Other fascinating items waiting in my inbox: Karin Chenoweth’s take on the IES Reading First report is crystal clear on what the data shows…and what it doesn’t; and a study shows elementary-school teachers are poorly prepared by education schools to teach math. Hmmm. I wonder why no one is suggesting copying whatever it is that has helped New York’s teachers do so well.

Nice to be back.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

The Smartest Bears in the Zoo

One of the most revealing aspects of Fordham’s report on high-achieving kids in the era of NCLB is the accompanying teacher survey:

The national survey findings show that most teachers, at this point in our nation’s history, feel pressure to focus on their lowest-achieving students. Whether that’s because of NCLB we do not know (though teachers are certainly willing to blame the federal law). What’s perhaps most interesting about the teachers’ responses, however, is how committed they are to the principle that all students (regardless of performance level) deserve their fair share of attention and challenges.

This precisely describes my experience teaching 5th grade in the South Bronx. A teacher in a school where the majority of kids read below grade level is unlikely ever to be asked what he or she is doing for kids who are at or above grade level. The immediate concern is triage.

Continue reading ‘The Smartest Bears in the Zoo’

Anger Management

Steer clear of cars with these bumper stickers.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

“Not Your Problem” Kids

A Fordham Foundation study finds that high-achieving students are the most likely to suffer from the effects of No Child Left Behind.

These are the students I refer to as “Not Your Problem” kids.  As a teacher, when I raised concerns that my brighter student were bored and neglected, and expressed frustration at my inability to sufficiently differentiate instruction to challenge them, I was dismissed by an assistant principal who pointedly said “those kids are not your problem.”  She meant I was to focus on getting my low-achieving students to proficiency; the high achievers were already there and could be left to their own devices.

I’m positively giddy to see this issue getting attention.  It was my No. 1 concern as a classroom teacher.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Healthy, Wealthy and Whitmire

College students who are “morning people” may have a higher chance of graduating near the top of their class according to a new study (Hat Tip: NYC Educator). Researchers at North Texas University found early birds had an average grade point average (GPA) that was a full point higher than night owls: 3.5 vs. 2.5.

Richard Whitmire must have been valedictorian. The USA Today scribe has an interesting new edublog. Check out what time that man has been posting.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Five Great Teachers

Give a struggling student five great teachers in a row, and they’ll close the achievement gap all by themselves, right? The conventional wisdom says yes. A new study says maybe not. Eduwonkette has the goods.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

All Roads Lead to Early Childhood Ed

Want to know who will have the toughest time passing high school exit exams? Look at 4th grade test scores, grades and classroom behavior. A study Public Policy Institute of California, reported in the L.A. Times, will come as no surprise to 4th grade teachers:

The findings, based on an extensive study of student achievement in San Diego schools, call into question the effectiveness of aiming significant efforts and tens of millions of dollars at struggling high school seniors and older students to help them pass the exam.

The report recommends “moving a portion of these tutoring dollars to struggling students in earlier grades — when the students are still in school — could be a wise choice. An ounce of prevention could indeed be worth a pound of cure.”

Makes perfect sense, intervene early, and the earlier the better. I would wager real money that I could predict today which of my 5th graders are likely to graduate high school with a fairly high degree of accuracy based on their elementary school performance, and in most cases, the die was cast before they walked into my room. The battle is won and lost at an early age.

Update: Joanne Jacobs, who has probably forgotten more about education in California than I’ll ever know, is also on this.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

This is Your Brain on the Internet…Any Questions?

The AtlanticNicholas Carr, in the cover story of The Atlantic, worries that the Web has damaged his ability to think:

Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.

Carr’s cover story, “Is Google Making us Stupid?” notes that how we read matters as much as what we read. When you take most of your information from the Web “the ability to to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged.”

“My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles,” writes Carr. “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.”

I need to go back and finish that article now…

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Ed Research Drive-Thru Window

A potentially useful service is being offered up by the What Works Clearinghouse — “quick reviews” to help educators grasp the soundness of research studies that have made news. 

“There are all kinds of studies coming out daily that are cutting-edge,” Mark Dynarski, tells Education Week.  “The idea is whether the clearinghouse can help the public in determining whether studies are well crafted, if they use sound methods and make good inferences.”

The Clearinghouse’s quick reviews offer three possible ratings: “consistent with WWC evidence standards,” “consistent with WWC evidence standards with reservations, or “not consistent with WWC evidence standards” —the lowest of three possible ratings.

For example, a recent study in the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management looked at the affects the behavior and academic performance of sixth graders who are placed in middle school instead of elementary school and conclude they are about twice as likely to have a disciplinary problems as sixth graders in elementary schools.   The WWC’s quick review noted reservations about the results “because they may be affected by differences between the research groups that were not controlled for in the analysis.”

Wonder what they’d make of the Canadian fitness study…

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Fit for Higher Scores

A Canadian study suggests schools that push fitness and nutrition may also boost standardized reading and math scores.

A landmark study of 33 Ontario schools that are part of a health drive called Living Schools — where students exercise each day, play extra sports and are discouraged from eating junk food — saw overall scores climb by 18 per cent over two years in reading, writing and math, compared to about 4 per cent for similar schools not in the provincially funded program, reports the Toronto Star.

The link between fitness, nutrition and student achievement “is a wake-up call for Canadians shamed last week by a study showing children across the country spend four to six hours a day in front of a screen – landing the nation an F in physical activity,” the paper reports.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]