Archive for October, 2008

Checker Finn Buries the Lead

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

The Fordham Foundation’s Checker Finn looks at the budget austerity facing U.S. schools in the new Education Gadfly, and the conventional wisdom that any reductions are bound to damage the quality of schooling. He lays out and skewers a half dozen arguments typically used to combat cuts:

We see signs of the “Washington Monument gambit,” i.e., the threat by the National Park Service that, if it doesn’t get more money, it won’t be able to keep one of the Capital’s foremost tourist attractions open for visitors. Its counterpart in public education is to say that, if we have to cut our budget, we’ll have to (take your pick) eliminate sports, increase class size, abbreviate the school year, scrap gifted education, end after-school programs, curb college counseling, close the school library, etc., etc. That’s how school systems think about budgets: in terms of “programs” and “services,” not efficiencies, productivity, or such tradeoffs as personnel versus technology.

The kicker comes at the end, when it’s revealed that Finn’s essay is a barely updated version of a previous piece he wrote five years ago–the last time there were widespread budget cuts.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

When Homework is a Headache — Literally

Children who develop headaches while reading or who struggle to complete their homework may be sufferring from an under-diagnosed vision problem. As many as one of every 20 students have some degree of “CI” or  “convergence insufficiency,” the AP reports. Standard vision screenings administered by schools won’t catch it, since such exams stress distance vision.

To bring print or other close-in work into focus, both eyes must turn slightly inward, or converge. Convergence insufficiency means the eyes aren’t doing that properly. Words may appear blurry or double, or disappear as readers lose their place.  “Complaints are rare in very young children because pictures and large type don’t require as much convergence,” the AP notes.  “Parents tend to start noticing a problem once homework and deeper reading begins.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Ivy League Arrogance

High above Cayuga’s waters. And everyone else. 

A court has ruled that a New York City teacher  who called his class a “filthy animals who belonged in a f—ing zoo” cannot get his job back.  Steven Clarke, a newly hired probationary teacher allegedly said in front of his class at the Global Enterprise Academy in the Bronx “my parents did not sacrifice for me to go to Cornell so I could take care of a bunch of animals.”

I’m guessing they didn’t send him to Cornell to become an arrogant lout, either.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

KIPP Moving Into Elementary Ed

This slipped under the radar screen: By 2011, one out of four KIPP schools–30 in all–will be elementary schools, compared to only ten percent today.  So KIPP said Monday in a press release announcing a $5.5 million grant from the Rainwater Foundation.  ”KIPP has realized that many of the youngsters it serves arrive at fifth grade already behind grade level,” notes the New America Foundation’s Sara Mead, “and has begun focusing increased attention on the early elementary school years.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

21st Century B.C. Skills

Eduwonk Andy Rotherham gives voice today to something that has been irritating me for a while now–the careless and self-indulgent tossing about of the phrase “21st Century Skills” to describe the simple outcome of a sound, basic education.  Problem solving, critical thinking and cooperative learning have been with us in this country since we hunted in groups using spears with Clovis points.  As Andy puts it:

 We’re not the first society where those skills have been needed or valued.   What’s changed is the need —  for both equity and economic reasons — to give many more students a high quality education that allows them to develop these skills.   In other words it’s about broadening access to a good education rather than a radically different conception of what a good education is.   If dressing that up as 21st Century Skills helps sell an equity agenda, that’s great, otherwise we are flattering ourselves some about just how revolutionary the world we live in really is.

Amen.  The sooner we stop nattering on about “21st Century” skills the better, especially since the phrase tends to be code for devaluing the content-rich curriculum that makes critical thinking possible.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Ms. Cahill For Congress

When one of her 6th grade students remarked “you can’t run for office in this country unless you’re a millionaire or you know a lot of millionaires,” Nevada public school teacher Tierney Cahill insisted that in a democracy anyone can run for office.  Her students dared her to prove it–by running herself. 

Looking at twenty-eight intent faces, I knew that I had just been handed a test. Would this grown-up be as contradictory and hypocritical as so many of the adults and personalities in their lives? If our country worked the way I had said it did, and if normal people could—and should—be involved in government, then as their teacher I shouldn’t have a problem stepping up to do what they’d asked. It was as if they were saying, “Either you are what you say you are and you believe that whole line you gave us, or you’re totally full of crap, and we’re going to find out right now.” In many ways, our roles of teacher and pupil had suddenly switched.  What I say is really going to matter, and I’d better think fast, I realized.

Thoughts rocketed through my brain like simultaneous fireworks explosions.

Oh my god, what have I gotten myself into?

Do I believe what I told them? Or am I simply a mouthpiece for the establishment? Are these kids going to look back and resent me someday when they think about their teacher’s rosy, half-honest introduction to politics?

She ran, and ended up winning the Democratic primary in Reno, with her students acting as her campaign managers.  Her new book, Ms. Cahill for Congress tells the story.

This has all the makings of the next big ”hero teacher” movie.  No surprise then to learn that Hollywood is already all over it.  Halle Berry will play Ms. Cahill.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

We’re Now On Alltop

The Core Knowledge Blog is now on the front education page of Alltop, the web aggregator and “online magazine rack” of popular topics.  Happy to be aboard.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Is “Manatee High School” Already Taken?

The school board in Jacksonville, Florida will decide next week whether to change the name of Nathan Bedford Forrest High School to Firestone High, stripping the name of the Confederate general off the majority African-American school. 

As the Atlanta Journal-Constitution notes, there’s been a backlash in the South against taking the name of Confederate leaders off of schools.  However, Forrest made his fortune as a plantation owner and slave trader; his resume includes a role as an early leader of the Ku Klux Klan. 

In 1867, the newly formed Klan elected Forrest its honorary Grand Wizard or national leader, but publicly denied being involved. In 1869, he ordered the Klan to disband because of the members’ increasing violence. Two years later, a congressional investigation concluded his involvement had been limited to his attempt to disband it.

One wonders what Jay Greene would make of this.  Jay famously made a study of school names that showed just how controversy-averse school naming has become.  He discovered that more schools in Florida were named for manatees than George Washington.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

“Stop Demoralizing Teachers”

Why does the answer to improving student achievement always seem to come down to lengthening the school day and adding more professional development, asks Philadelphia schoolteacher Christopher Paslay.  “I’ve been teaching in Philadelphia for 12 years, and I still don’t agree with this philosophy,” he writes in an op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer.  “More isn’t always better.”

There are three parts of the education equation: teachers, students and parents. All three of these must be up and running at a minimum level for education to take place. Just as a car needs a working battery and transmission to operate properly, so a school system needs the support and cooperation of parents and students as well as teachers. If parents and students don’t get actively involved, how will extending the school day improve academic achievement? If education isn’t made a priority in children’s homes, what will requiring more professional development for teachers accomplish?

Accountability absolutists will dismiss Paslay’s take as an exercise in excuse-making, but his point that teachers are “only one part of a complex instructional ecosystem” will ring true to teachers.   Paslay’s Rx includes reducing class sizes in poorly performing schools, tuition reimbursement for teachers who agree to teach in failing schools, and most pointedly, “stop demoralizing teachers by making us the eternal scapegoats. In other words, hold parents and the community accountable, too.”

Do more of the sort of thing former Mayor John Street and former Police Commissioner Sylvester Johnson did in 2006, when they gave summonses to 6,000 parents of truant schoolchildren, bringing them to Temple’s Liacouras Center to talk about the importance of getting their sons and daughters to school.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Poor Speller? Blame Your G-E-N-E-S

Some people have a way with words.  Othurs not weigh haf.  According to the Times of London, it could just be your genes. 

In the past, poor spelling was attributed to all manner of things, from bad schooling to a lack of moral fibre. But science is offering a new explanation. A difficulty with spelling could be rooted in your genes and in the way that your brain is wired. These findings stem from research into the language disorder dyslexia, but they are proving important for the wider population. Biology, it seems, not only influences those with dyslexia but also people without the syndrome. If you are a bad speller you can blame your grey matter.

Simply deciphering the written word is the most complex task your brain will face says John Stein, Professor of Neuroscience at Oxford University Medical School, who notes that written language is a relatively recent invention.  “It was invented only 5,000 years ago, notes Stein.  “It is piggybacked on to our linguistic ability, which was invented 30,000-40,000 years ago.  The consequence is that many people fail to read or spell.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]