<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fuelish Notion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/06/12/a-fuelish-notion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/06/12/a-fuelish-notion/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adso of Melk</title>
		<link>http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/06/12/a-fuelish-notion/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>Adso of Melk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/?p=495#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I love this idea.  

Selfishly speaking, I would love the four-day workweek and three-day weekend split; I think it makes much more logical sense.  It would, as many advocates have pointed out, save money on gas and commute time.

More than that -- and more cynically -- I think it would finally make some parents realize to what degree they depend upon schools for many things, but not the least for the tax-based, government-sponsored daycare that allows them to maintain a lifestyle affordable only by two-income families.  For those retirees and others who complain about higher taxes funding education, surely they're aware to what degree our entire consumer economy depends upon income earned from a two-earner family.  Without school there to be our society's babysitter, more  parents would have to stay home.

Sometimes, you don't know how much you're gonna miss something 'till it's gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I love this idea.  </p>
<p>Selfishly speaking, I would love the four-day workweek and three-day weekend split; I think it makes much more logical sense.  It would, as many advocates have pointed out, save money on gas and commute time.</p>
<p>More than that &#8212; and more cynically &#8212; I think it would finally make some parents realize to what degree they depend upon schools for many things, but not the least for the tax-based, government-sponsored daycare that allows them to maintain a lifestyle affordable only by two-income families.  For those retirees and others who complain about higher taxes funding education, surely they&#8217;re aware to what degree our entire consumer economy depends upon income earned from a two-earner family.  Without school there to be our society&#8217;s babysitter, more  parents would have to stay home.</p>
<p>Sometimes, you don&#8217;t know how much you&#8217;re gonna miss something &#8217;till it&#8217;s gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
