Archive for April, 2008

A Teachable Moment

To write about education is to dwell, alas, on what isn’t working in our schools. So for once, a tale about something that went very right. If you don’t follow sports, you probably missed it on ESPN and the sports page of the New York Times. It’s the story of a remarkable display of character and sportsmanship at a college softball game the other day.

Western Oregon’s Sara Tucholsky, all of 5′2″ and a .153 hitter, hits the first home run she’s ever hit, in high school or college. Even though it’s out of the park, the rules say “touch ‘em all.” So when she runs past first base and realizes she didn’t touch the bag, she stops to go back. And blows out her knee.

The rules also say her teammates can’t help her around the bases, or even help her off the ground. If a coach touches her she’s out. If a pinch runner comes in, it’s a single, not a homer. Tucholsky crawls back to first but can go no further.

Confusion. Silence. Then a voice, belonging to Central Washington senior Mallory Holtman, who holds every softball record worth holding in the school’s record book: “‘Excuse me, would it be OK if we carried her around and she touched each bag?’” There’s no rule against it. So Holtman and teammate Liz Wallace pick up Tucholsky and carry her the rest of the way, stopping to let her touch each base with her left foot–an act that contributed to their own elimination from the playoffs.

“It kept everything in perspective and the fact that we’re never bigger than the game,” Western Oregon coach Pam Knox told ESPN. “It was such a lesson that we learned — that it’s not all about winning. And we forget that, because as coaches, we’re always trying to get to the top. We forget that. But I will never, ever forget this moment. It’s changed me, and I’m sure it’s changed my players.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Who Is A Progressive?

The talented Eduwonkette scores the blog equivalent of the the talk show “good get” by having Bill Ayers guest blog a response to Sol Stern’s broadside. Let a thousand flowers bloom. But mixed up in Ayers’ innocuous sounding responses (”Stern favors teaching for social injustice?”) is, as always, the great unasked question: Who is the true progressive? The teacher, self-consciously teaching for social justice, seeking to empower students in her child-centered classroom, a well-thumbed copy of Paolo Friere’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed near at hand? Or the “instructivist” who seeks to give the have-nots the intellectual capital they need to be full participants in society? How do we best serve our students, through opposition or access to power? Ends or means? Who is really “serving the interests of oppressor” here, Professor Ayers?

One might argue that education in America—hence the cause of social justice—has been set back decades by wrapping any number of ineffective pedagogical fads with the progressive label. What earnest young teacher, starting out in an inner city or rural school doesn’t see him or herself as progressive? Yet an emphasis on academic curriculum or direct instruction—sound, academic content and effective practice–is somehow branded “anti-progressive.” It takes a long time, and a fiercely independent streak, for a teacher to realize that perhaps they’re failing their students by accepting these narrow, dogmatic labels.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Things Are Tough All Over

Any teacher who has ever felt disrespected and antagonized by disruptive students might take comfort from the actions of this instructor, who is threatening to sue her students for discrimination.  At least until they find out the plaintiff is a professor at Dartmouth.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Teaching Children to Be Students

Webster Elementary School in San Diego credits its turnaround to explicit instruction on how to behave in class (Hat Tip: This Week in Education).  The “Webster Way” teaches “scholarly behaviors” such as eye contact, cleaning up your trash, and greeting teachers by name, reports the online Voice of San Diego newspaper.

“The Webster Way originated in a school-wide effort to understand poverty and its impact on education. Most teachers at the school are white,” VOSD reports.  “Their students are mostly from low-income Latino and black families. Teachers read and reflected together on sociological texts about poverty and the achievement gap, but the Webster Way emerged from their own efforts to observe and document what set their best students apart. They jotted down notes about their highest-achieving students, then pooled their research.

“They spoke up in class. They balanced when to speak and when to listen. They turned toward the speaker. Those behaviors — not their brightness — separated them from their lower-achieving peers and enabled them to absorb information.”

The Webster Way sounds very much like a description in the New York Times Magazine of how KIPP and Achievement First students are explicitly taught to Slant, an acronym which stands for sit up, listen, ask questions, nod if you understand, and track the speaker with your eyes. 

According to Paul Tough’s 2006 article What It Takes to Make a Student, “Americans of a certain background learn these methods for taking in information early on and employ them instinctively. KIPP students need to be taught the methods explicitly. And so it is a little unnerving to stand at the front of a KIPP class; every eye is on you. When a student speaks, every head swivels to watch her. To anyone raised in the principles of progressive education, the uniformity and discipline in KIPP classrooms can be off-putting. But the kids I spoke to said they use the Slant method not because they fear they will be punished otherwise but because it works: it helps them to learn.”

 

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

You Mean My Principal Can See My Facebook Page??!?

Yes.  And your students’ parents.  Your students, too.

That giant snapping sound you hear is the sound of teachers–if they have the brains that God gave a giraffe–restricting access to their Facebook and MySpace pages after reading this article in today’s Washington Post.  Seems there are a few molders of impressionable young minds who exercise questionable judgement in what they see fit to post on their personal pages.

“I know that employers will look at that page, and I need to be more careful,” says Erin Jane Webster, a substitute teacher in Prince William County, Virginia.  (OMG, Erin! Ya think?) “At the same time, my work and social lives are completely separate. I just feel they shouldn’t take it seriously. I am young. I just turned 22.”  The Post describes part of Miss Webster’s page as suggesting its author “is in the throes of sorority rush.”

One wonders how the “completely separate” and “I’m only 22″ line will work on her students’ parents at Meet the Teacher night.  On second thought, why wonder?  She’ll probably put it on YouTube. 

Update:  Joanne Jacobs weighs in, as does Eduflack.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Incidental Intelligence

How much informal or “free choice” science knowledge do children pick up outside of school? We might have a better grasp of the answer this summer when the The National Academies, a congressionally chartered nonprofit group that advises the federal government, will release a report on what’s known about the role in science education played by museums, zoos and aquariums.

It will be interesting to see what the study finds—and if the data will be broken out by socioeconomic group. Educators concerned about the narrowing of curriculum in the age of No Child Left Behind, present company included, worry that advantaged students feel the impact of curriculum narrowing less acutely than disadvantaged children, who are less likely to visit museums and zoos, or have other out-of-school opportunities for free choice science education.

“The report comes as experts bemoan a lack of scientific education and literacy among Americans,” notes the Associated Press. “They warn of a shortfall in homegrown engineers and scientists to keep the nation competitive, a general work force ill-equipped to function in an increasingly high-tech workplace, and a citizenry struggling to grasp complex public issues like stem cell research. While that has led to calls for changes in schools, science museums — broadly defined to include a range of science-oriented places to visit — can also play a big role in teaching and promoting science to both children and adults.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Art for Art’s Sake

“If arts education stakes its claim to students’ time and schools’ money on some unproven power to push standardized test scores upward, its position in American schools is bound to be precarious,” notes Ann Hulbert in the New York Times Magazine. She was responding to a claim made by Barack Obama on the campaign trail that “children who learn music actually do better in math, children whose imaginations are sparked by the arts are more engaged in school.”

A direct link between arts education and higher test scores is elusive, Hulbert notes, but that’s not a reason to ignore the arts in school. Citing research by Ellen Winner, a Boston College professor of psychology, and Lois Hetland, who teaches at Massachusetts College of Art and Design, she notes evidence that engaging in in art and music in school helps students develop “persistence in tackling problems, observational acuity, expressive clarity, reflective capacity to question and judge, ability to envision alternative possibilities and openness to exploration.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Gaming NCLB

Eighty California schools got “out of trouble” with No Child Left Behind in the past two years by changing the way they classify their students, according to an analysis by the Sacramento Bee. The changes enabled the school to alter their status from failing to passing under the law.

The paper cites the example of Sacramento’s Will C. Wood Middle School. Last August, most of the school’s students had met benchmarks set by No Child Left Behind. But African American students’ math scores fell far short. “One hundred students were categorized as black when they took the test last spring. But if the school had fewer than 100 students in that group, their low scores wouldn’t count,” the Bee reports. “So Principal Jim Wong reviewed the files of all the students classified as African American on the test, he said, and found that four of them had indicated no race or mixed race on their enrollment paperwork. Wong sent his staff to talk to the four families to ask permission to put the kids in a different racial group.”

“You get a kid that’s half black, half white. What are you going to put him down as?” Wong told the paper. “If one kid makes the difference and I can go white, that gets me out of trouble.”

A pretty extraordinary admission for a principal to make on the record. And quite a job of reporting on the games schools play by the Sacramento Bee, which notes California doesn’t verify whether the changes schools make accurately reflect the students they serve.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Required Reading

From Core Knowledge

An Epoch-Making Report, But What About the Early Grades?

By E.D. Hirsch, Jr.

In the 25 years since A Nation at Risk was issued, writes Core Knowledge founder E.D. Hirsch, Jr., energetic reform efforts have been put forth, to small overall effect. This persistent lack of significant improvement is owing to the unwavering persistence of the very ideas that caused the decline in the first place—the repudiation of a definite academic curriculum in the early grades by the child-centered movement of the early 20th century.

Best of the Blogs

What Should Happen in Our Houses of Learning? — Diane Ravitch in Bridging Differences
“The goal is not the problem. The implementation is. ”

Gering Public Schools: The School District to Watch — D-ed Reckoning
Direct Instruction turns around a Nebraska district

A Closer Look at School Violence in Chicago — Eduwonkette
What do trends in weapon-carrying and fighting among teenagers in Chicago look like?

Nzeyimana can’t use ‘prowl’ in a sentence — Joanne Jacobs
How do you pass No Child Left Behind, when you don’t speak English?

Teaching, Content and Curriculum

Still at Risk
By Frederick M. Hess, American Enterprise Institute,
When it comes to familiarity with major historical events and significant literary accomplishments, America’s seventeen-year-olds fare rather poorly. When it comes to familiarity with the base of knowledge that enables us to engage in conversations about values and policy, our seventeen-year-olds are barely literate.

Report Calls for Moving Away From K-12 Tests and Sanctions
By David J. Hoff, Education Week
Congress and the next president need to offer a new vision for the federal role in K-12 education, creating a sustained effort to increase the quality of teachers, tailoring accountability systems to measure higher-order thinking, and ensuring that all spending is equalized across school districts, a report from a group of educators and researchers says.

Education Policy

‘Nation at Risk’: The best thing or the worst thing for education?
By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY
Twenty-five years ago this week, Americans awoke to a forceful little report that, depending on your point of view, either ruined public education or saved it. “A Nation at Risk” kick-started decades of tough talk about public schools and reforms that culminated in 2002’s No Child Left Behind, the Bush administration law that pushes schools to improve students’ basic skills or face ever-tougher sanctions.

Obama’s Real Bill Ayers Problem
By Sol Stern, City Journal
Barack Obama complains that he’s been unfairly attacked for a casual political and social relationship with his neighbor, former Weatherman Bill Ayers. But the more pressing issue is not the damage done by the Weather Underground 40 years ago, but the far greater harm inflicted on the nation’s schoolchildren by the political and educational movement in which Ayers plays a leading role today.

Education Secretary Offers Changes to ‘No Child’ Law
By Sam Dillon, The New York Times
Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings used her executive powers on Tuesday to propose a series of ninth-inning regulatory fixes to President Bush’s signature education law, No Child Left Behind, including requiring states to use a single federal formula to calculate and report high school graduation rates. Ms. Spellings also wants to require schools to notify parents of their right to transfer students out of failing schools two weeks before the start of each school year, and to explain more fully to parents the opportunities for federally financed tutoring that are available to students attending troubled schools.

Parenting and Homeschooling

‘America’s Worst Mom?’
By Lenore Skenazy, The New York Sun
When I wrote a column in this paper last week, “Why I Let My 9-Year-Old Take The Subway Alone,” I figured I’d get some emails — pro and con. Two days later I was on the “Today Show,” MSNBC, Fox News, and all manner of talk radio with a new title under my smiling face: “America’s Worst Mom?”

California Court to Reconsider Homeschooling
By Michael Coulter, School Reform News
California’s Second Appellate District Court of Appeals touched off a firestorm when it issued an opinion that parents have no right to homeschool their own children–a firestorm so great that on March 25, a full month after issuing its decision, the court agreed to rehear the case, with a decision expected in June.

Homeschool parents, kids oppose bill
By Michael Brindley, Nashua (NH) Telegraph
For the second time in two weeks, homeschool parents and their children turned out in droves to oppose a bill that would require parents to submit a curriculum plan to the state. The legislature passed a bill in 2006 that eliminated the requirement for parents to submit such a plan on an annual basis.

Homeschooling notification is not an undue burden
Editorial, The Press & Argus Livingston, MI
Parents have every right to homeschool their children, and Lansing needs to be very careful whenever it considers legislation that might inhibit that right. That said, we don’t feel that it’s an undue burden on homeschooling parents to be required to notify their home school district that they’re educating their children at home.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Bill Ayers Is Worse Than a Terrorist. He’s An Ed School Professor

Critics have taken issue Barack Obama’s relationship with his neighbor, former Weatherman Bill Ayers. But it’s not Ayers radical, bomb-making past that should trouble people, writes Sol Stern in City Journal, but the far greater harm inflicted on the nation’s schoolchildren by the political and educational movement in which Ayers plays a leading role today.

“What [Obama] can be blamed for is not acknowledging that his neighbor has a political agenda that, if successful, would make it impossible to lift academic achievement for disadvantaged children,” Stern writes. “Ayers’s politics have hardly changed since his Weatherman days. He still boasts about working full-time to bring down American capitalism and imperialism. This time, however, he does it from his tenured perch as Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of Illinois, Chicago. Instead of planting bombs in public buildings, Ayers now works to indoctrinate America’s future teachers in the revolutionary cause, urging them to pass on the lessons to their public school students.”

“Unfortunately, neither Obama nor his critics in the media seem to have a clue about Ayers’s current work and his widespread influence in the education schools,” Stern writes.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]