<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How About &#8220;Unacceptable&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/</link>
	<description>Closing the Achievement Gap: Teaching Content</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/2008/03/24/how-about-unacceptable/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>I find "priority schools" a bit hurtful, personally. It sounds neutral at first, until you realize it's a loaded term with a hierarchy looming behind it. I would go for "deficiency-rich schools." After all, the greater the deficiency, the greater the potential improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find &#8220;priority schools&#8221; a bit hurtful, personally. It sounds neutral at first, until you realize it&#8217;s a loaded term with a hierarchy looming behind it. I would go for &#8220;deficiency-rich schools.&#8221; After all, the greater the deficiency, the greater the potential improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
