“My Dear,” said the gentleman to the lady, “would you go to bed with me for a million dollars?”
“Well, yes, I suppose I would,” she replied.
“Here’s $100. Let’s go then.”
“How dare you! What kind of person do you think I am?”
“My Dear, we have already established that. Now we are merely haggling over the price!”
I’m reminded of that droll old joke, variously attributed to George Bernard Shaw or Winston Churchill and Lady Astor, when I read stories about the emerging number of schemes to pay students for passing grades on standardized tests and other academic achievements. As educators, we have long since established the practice — stickers, prizes, pizza parties, extra recess, etc. — of rewarding kids for performance. Now we are haggling over the price. Our problem is exactly the opposite of Lady Astor’s. We see nothing wrong when we can motivate students cheaply or easily. But once the reward is cold, hard cash, our sense of propriety is offended.
An excellent piece by Sara Neufeld in today’s Baltimore Sun, looks at the issue. “Somehow there is a moralistic approach about what they should be doing,” observes Andres Alonso, head of the Baltimore school system, which has announced a plan to pay struggling students to improve their test scores. “In fact the conversation should be about the fact that we have found it acceptable for so many of these students to not graduate without real consequences for anyone other than the children we are supposed to be serving.”












Recent Comments