Archive for January 18th, 2008

Accountable Talk

The Boston GlobeMassachusetts’ newly hired state education commissioner Mitchell Dan Chester tells the Boston Globe he’s “not interested in coming to Massachusetts to manage the status quo.” The state is often viewed as a bright spot, with solid numbers on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS), but to his credit, Chester sound utterly clear-eyed about what he’s walking into. “MCAS is an important cornerstone of the reform agenda but the MCAS has its limitations, and is irrelevant to high-achieving suburbs where MCAS is not the driving force,” he tells the paper. “Passing the MCAS doesn’t mean you’re ready for college.” The Globe reports Chester’s youngest son “a 10-year-old with limited language and socialization skills, struggles in school.”

In Pennsylvania, high school students could have to pass a new series of state exams to graduate under a plan approved Thursday by the State Board of Education. A year of hearings will come first. “As a former principal and superintendent,” the state education secretary, Gerald L. Zahorchak tells the New York Times, “I know I shook the hands of a number of students at graduation who were really receiving an empty diploma.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Backdoor National Standards

ED in ‘08 / Strong American SchoolsHow do we achieve national standards without making it a top-down demand from Washington? Edin08’s Roy Romer argues for a group of states drafting a set of common standards, benchmarking the standards against high-performing nations, and in what sounds like the highway-aid-for-21-drinking age playbook, giving the states “incentives to adopt the model standards, such as free use of assessments designed to measure performance against the standards, or a new deal under NCLB with different timelines and accountability provisions to support meeting the higher standards.”

So Romer ostensibly says in an interview with this web site.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Who Do You Believe? Me or Your Lying Eyes?

Education SectorI respect and admire eduwonk, but I have to strenuously disagree with his characterization of the impact of testing and No Child Left Behind as “hysterics.” I wholeheartedly support accountability, and I don’t have a problem with standardized tests. Really, I don’t. But one cannot blithely dismiss the narrowing of the curriculum that has occurred in schools — especially struggling inner city schools — in order to beef up test scores. It’s literacy, math and not much else, despite compelling evidence that content knowledge is the key to reading comprehension. We’re serving students in our most challenged schools a thin gruel that doesn’t meet any reasonable standard for an education. We simply have to do better, not dismiss the critics. The NY Times highlighted a few schools that are aiming higher, but to suggest that this shows testing concerns are overblown is a curious conclusion.

It bothers me to hear a well-respected policy analyst take such a stance, for I fear it could invite other less serious observers to downplay the deleterious impact of testing culture, rather than do the hard work of creating and implementing an accountability strategy that resists being gamed, dumbed-down, or measures only the thinnest slices of school performance. “All that test prep isn’t that bad,” it will be argued. “At least they’re learning something.” Isn’t it pretty to think so?

Make no mistake. There are classrooms where students go weeks, months, an entire school year without social studies, science, art and music. I’ve seen them, been in them, and worked with teachers who, despite great misgivings, felt pressured to run them. It’s neither hysterics nor hyperbole. It’s a legitimate issue that left unaddressed or blithely dismissed, could ultimately stop reform dead in its tracks. The very worst thing that can occur is if people believe the accountability cure is worse than the disease. “Drill and kill” is not the issue. It’s kids who can decode, but can’t comprehend. It’s kids who get to high school and college without the functional knowledge they need to succeed in higher education and as full participants in society. It’s complacency that kids who score on grade level are being educated, when all they’re doing is stepping over a hurdle that is conveniently lowered year after year.

Dismiss it at your peril. It’s real. I’ve seen it, lived it. I’ll introduce you to the students who’ve been damaged by it. Accountability was designed to help them, not do further harm. Good enough is not good enough.

Oh, my. I’m having a Hillary moment….I just don’t want to see us fall backwards.

Update: The redoubtable eduwonk thinks I doth protest too much. Perhaps so. But why use two words when ten will do?

Update II: eduwonkette has my back.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]